By the Nordic Council of Ministers and Nordic Council on Nordic co-operation

In the period 2021–2023, the Nordic governments introduced 43 measures to compensate for and mitigate rising energy prices. A new report evaluates their impact on income distribution, the climate and the environment.

Energy and fuel prices soared in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Nordic countries responded with a series of measures to help households and companies cope with the higher costs of electricity, heating and fuel.

A new report evaluates some of the many schemes, focusing on their impact on income distribution, the climate and the environment. It concludes that several of the measures have discouraged efficient uses of energy or had a detrimental effect on the climate and, To compound matters, they have provided only limited help to low-income households.

Missing out on win-win situations

According to the report, Nordic governments missed several opportunities to create win-win situations that would have balanced compensation and long-term benefits for the climate.

Only two initiatives, one Danish and one Norwegian, provided direct support for investments in green technology. The report also points out that the various subsidies for energy bills can have created an expectation for the future, which may mean there is less incentive to save energy and replace existing equipment with greener alternatives.

“The report clearly identifies the conflict between the objectives behind the various compensation schemes and the lack of time to draw them up,” says Magnus Cederlöf, chair of the Nordic Working Group for Environment and Economy (NME), which commissioned the report.

Cederlöf also stresses the importance of remembering that the full impact of the countries’ reactions to the energy crisis has not yet been felt and that the picture may become clear or change as more data becomes available.

“Nevertheless, we believe the report will help the governments devise more effective aid packages in future when decisions need to be made quickly and under unusual or critical circumstances,” says Cederlöf.

More information: The report was commissioned by the Nordic Working Group for Environment and Economy (NME) under the Nordic Council of Ministers for the Environment and Climate and written by a consortium led by Anthesis AB in collaboration with Menon Economics and the University of Copenhagen. Featured image credit:  ZHANG FENGSHENG | Unsplash

Satellite Image: Copenhagen, Denmark
Image of the day: Copenhagen’s islands and its carbon-neutral visionNews

Image of the day: Copenhagen’s islands and its carbon-neutral vision

Copenhagen, the capital of Denmark, spans the islands of Zealand and Amager, connected by bridges and surrounded by the Øresund strait. The city has grown…
Muser NewsDeskMuser NewsDeskAugust 11, 2025 Full article
Aerial Shot of Switzerland Flag Waving over Lucerne (s. Swiss, environment)
Swiss vote rejects placing ecology at heart of constitutionNews

Swiss vote rejects placing ecology at heart of constitution

Geneva, Switzerland | AFP Swiss voters on Sunday firmly rejected a referendum proposal put forward by green politicians to enshrine respect for the planet's natural…
SourceSourceFebruary 9, 2025 Full article
Satellite Image: Mont Idoukal-n-Taghès, Niger
Image of the day: The volcanic heights of Mont Idoukal-n-Taghès in NigerNews

Image of the day: The volcanic heights of Mont Idoukal-n-Taghès in Niger

Mont Idoukal-n-Taghès, standing 2,022 metres above sea level, is the highest peak in Niger and a striking landmark of the Aïr Massif in the country’s…
Muser NewsDeskMuser NewsDeskNovember 1, 2025 Full article