By the Nordic Council of Ministers and Nordic Council on Nordic co-operation

In the period 2021–2023, the Nordic governments introduced 43 measures to compensate for and mitigate rising energy prices. A new report evaluates their impact on income distribution, the climate and the environment.

Energy and fuel prices soared in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Nordic countries responded with a series of measures to help households and companies cope with the higher costs of electricity, heating and fuel.

A new report evaluates some of the many schemes, focusing on their impact on income distribution, the climate and the environment. It concludes that several of the measures have discouraged efficient uses of energy or had a detrimental effect on the climate and, To compound matters, they have provided only limited help to low-income households.

Missing out on win-win situations

According to the report, Nordic governments missed several opportunities to create win-win situations that would have balanced compensation and long-term benefits for the climate.

Only two initiatives, one Danish and one Norwegian, provided direct support for investments in green technology. The report also points out that the various subsidies for energy bills can have created an expectation for the future, which may mean there is less incentive to save energy and replace existing equipment with greener alternatives.

“The report clearly identifies the conflict between the objectives behind the various compensation schemes and the lack of time to draw them up,” says Magnus Cederlöf, chair of the Nordic Working Group for Environment and Economy (NME), which commissioned the report.

Cederlöf also stresses the importance of remembering that the full impact of the countries’ reactions to the energy crisis has not yet been felt and that the picture may become clear or change as more data becomes available.

“Nevertheless, we believe the report will help the governments devise more effective aid packages in future when decisions need to be made quickly and under unusual or critical circumstances,” says Cederlöf.

More information: The report was commissioned by the Nordic Working Group for Environment and Economy (NME) under the Nordic Council of Ministers for the Environment and Climate and written by a consortium led by Anthesis AB in collaboration with Menon Economics and the University of Copenhagen. Featured image credit:  ZHANG FENGSHENG | Unsplash

Image: cars in a parking lot
EVs alone won’t save us from climate catastropheClimate

EVs alone won’t save us from climate catastrophe

By Lily Rau, Climateworks Centre, Melbourne | 360info Zero-emissions vehicles would need to hit 73 percent of new light vehicle sales by 2030 to keep transport…
SourceSourceJuly 3, 2024 Full article
Graphic news (s. climate, science, research, scientists. emission targets, floods, environment)
EU states back new delay to anti-deforestation rulesNews

EU states back new delay to anti-deforestation rules

Brussels, Belgium | AFP EU member states Wednesday backed a new one-year delay to sweeping anti-deforestation rules that have hit a wall of opposition from businesses…
SourceSourceNovember 19, 2025 Full article
Hourglass with Earth inside with an glacier melting above - global warming concept
Civil society organizations unveil ‘Principles for a Fair JETP’ framework ahead of G7 summitNewsClimate

Civil society organizations unveil ‘Principles for a Fair JETP’ framework ahead of G7 summit

A coalition of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) from South Africa, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Senegal has launched the 'Principles for a Fair Just Energy Transition Partnership…
Adrian AlexandreAdrian AlexandreJune 10, 2024 Full article