Washington, United States (AFP) – The US Supreme Court declined on Friday to block environmental regulations aimed at reducing harmful emissions of mercury from power plants and methane from oil and gas facilities.

The court, without comment, rejected a request by industry groups and Republican state attorneys general who had asked for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules to be put on hold while litigation continues in lower courts.

The EPA regulations, brought under the Clean Air Act, are designed to limit emissions of mercury and other toxic air pollutants from coal-fired power plants and curb emissions of methane — a super-pollutant greenhouse gas — from oil and gas facilities.

They are being challenged by power and mining companies and oil and gas firms who contend they are unnecessary and costly.

The nonprofit National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) welcomed the Supreme Court move allowing the EPA rules to remain in place for now.

“The Supreme Court has sensibly rejected two efforts by industry to halt critical safeguards,” David Doniger, a senior attorney at the NRDC, said in a statement.

“For far too long, oil and gas producers have been allowed to ignore the leaks in their own equipment and let dangerous methane and smog-forming compounds pollute our air,” Doniger said.

In June, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked the implementation of an EPA measure aimed at curbing air pollution that drifts across state lines from facilities like power plants.

The “good neighbor” plan would not have taken effect until 2026, but a series of states and companies requested that it be blocked now while litigation against it plays out in a lower court — a request the Supreme Court granted in a 5-4 decision.

The court’s decision to temporarily block the plan was the third time in recent years that it has curbed the EPA’s powers, after it dealt a blow to the agency’s authority to regulate wetlands in 2023 and greenhouse gases in 2022.

cl/bfm

© Agence France-Presse

Featured image credit: Tim Mossholder | Unsplash

Image: View of green forest trees with CO2 (s. temperature, climate change)
How well will different US forests remove atmospheric carbon in the future?ClimateNews

How well will different US forests remove atmospheric carbon in the future?

By Wiley Forests absorb carbon by capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, making forest carbon stocks an important resource against climate change. In research published…
SourceSourceAugust 7, 2024 Full article
Image: Lake Tahoe; a shot of the snow capped peaks of Tahoe
Travellers urged to keep it local in the name of sustainable tourismClimate

Travellers urged to keep it local in the name of sustainable tourism

By University of South Australia From rolling vineyards to stunning beaches, there’s no shortage of beauty to discover in our own backyards. A tourism expert…
SourceSourceJune 20, 2024 Full article
Graphic news (s. climate, science, research, scientists. emission targets, floods, environment)
Scientists say Trump cuts threaten climate research, public safetyNews

Scientists say Trump cuts threaten climate research, public safety

Washington, United States | AFP Climate scientist Tom Di Liberto had dreamed of working at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) since college. After…
SourceSourceMarch 11, 2025 Full article